Our colleagues at Epstein Becker Green have a resent post on the Wage and Hour Defense Blog that will be of interest to our readers in the retail industry: “California Supreme Court’s Clarification of De Minimis Doctrine Leaves Many Questions Unanswered – and Does Little to Ease Plaintiffs’ Path to Class Certification.”
On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, ostensibly clarifying the application of the widely adopted de minimis doctrine to ...
Our colleague at Epstein Becker Green has a post on the Wage and Hour Defense blog that will be of interest to our readers in the retail industry: “Federal Court Concludes That 7-Eleven Franchisees Are Not Employees of 7-Eleven.”
Following is an excerpt:
In November 2017, four convenience store franchisees brought suit in federal court against 7-Eleven, Inc., alleging that they and all other franchisees were employees of 7-Eleven. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: Should Employers Shift Workforce Data Collection Under President Trump? - Employment Law This Week
- New Tennessee Immigration Enforcement Law: Key Measures and Implications
- Video: Workplace Law Shake-Up - DEI Challenges, NLRB Reversals, and EEOC Actions - Employment Law This Week
- California’s AI Revolution: Proposed CPPA Regulations Target Automated Decision Making
- Podcast: Trade Secrets in Hollywood - Lessons from Oscar-Nominated Films – Employment Law This Week