On September 6, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved a settlement in Harvey v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. The significance of the result is two-fold. First, substantively, it is a reminder to financial services firms of potential liability under California labor law when advisors are required to pay for business expenses. Second, procedurally, the court’s approval of the settlement is edifying on the subject of parallel class actions.
In the Harvey case, plaintiffs challenged Morgan Stanley Smith Barney’s ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- The Third Circuit Orders Another Review in Cornelius v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.—Resolution Will Wait for Another Day in New Jersey Federal Court, but Not Because of the EFAA
- Video: Artificial Intelligence Regulations for Employers - Employment Law This Week
- Video: EEOC/DOJ Joint DEI Guidance, EEOC Letters to Law Firms, OFCCP Retroactive DEI Enforcement - Employment Law This Week
- Another Court Partly Blocks DEI-Related Executive Orders; U.S. Government Continues to Stay Its Course
- No Ultimatums: New York State Lawmakers Contemplate New Mandatory Provisions for Severance Agreements