Employees who resign from work, sue their employer, and assert “constructive discharge” shoulder a heavy burden to demonstrate that they had no choice but to resign. A recent decision of the Massachusetts Appeals Court, Armato v. Town of Stoneham, shows just how heavy that burden is.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- New Federal Agency Policies and Protocols for Artificial Intelligence Utilization and Procurement Can Provide Useful Guidance for Private Entities
- Video: Non-Competes Eased, Anti-DEI Rule Blocked, Contractor Rule in Limbo - Employment Law This Week
- Video: Insider Strategies for Wage and Hour Compliance Success: One-on-One with Paul DeCamp
- Video: Can the President Fire NLRB Members Without Cause? SCOTUS May Decide - Employment Law This Week
- The Third Circuit Orders Another Review in Cornelius v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.—Resolution Will Wait for Another Day in New Jersey Federal Court, but Not Because of the EFAA